Z retrospective: how the Bitmap Brothers made the weirdest RTS of the ’90s

There are two types of real-time strategy games. The first type asks you to build a base, gather resources, train units, research upgrades, and slowly become a god of logistics. You are mayor, accountant, general, and stressed-out middle manager all at once. Then there is Z, the 1996 strategy game from The Bitmap Brothers, which kicks the door open, steals your clipboard, shouts “capture that flag, you idiot,” and drives off in a tank. Released during the great RTS gold rush of the mid-1990s, Z arrived in a world already transformed by Dune II, Warcraft, and Command & Conquer. But where those games were about building empires, Z was about grabbing territory before the other side could blink. It was fast, funny, aggressive, and British in the very specific way that makes even a robot sound like he has just been thrown out of a pub. The game’s idea was simple: capture flags, control territory, and use whatever factories, vehicles, and weapons you find along the way. There were no harvesters, no woodcutters, no peasant economy, no tiny man walking slowly across the screen carrying five pixels of gold. Z looked at all that and said, “What if we just got to the fighting bit?” This was not laziness. It was design. Every map in Z is divided into zones. Capture a flag and that zone becomes yours. If there is a factory inside it, that factory starts producing units for your army. The more territory you own, the faster your factories work. So the whole game becomes a frantic land grab, a tug-of-war where every second matters and every mistake is punished by a gang of metallic idiots calling you names.

The robots in Z are not noble soldiers. They are not silent drones. They are mouthy, lazy, sarcastic little machines who complain, cheer, panic, and occasionally behave as though they have been programmed by someone with a grudge against the player. They climb into vehicles, abandon them, get sniped out of them, and sometimes charge into danger with the tactical judgement of a toaster full of beer. It is glorious. And it is also exactly why Z still has a personality that many cleaner, smoother strategy games never managed to find. Its robots are not just units. They are tiny disasters with legs. To understand why Z felt so different, you have to understand The Bitmap Brothers. By the mid-1990s, the London studio had already built a reputation as one of Britain’s coolest game developers. This was the team behind Xenon, Speedball, The Chaos Engine, and Gods. Their games had a look: chrome, steel, shadows, attitude. They felt like arcade cabinets designed by people who listened to industrial music and owned too many black T-shirts. The Bitmap Brothers were not chasing warmth. They were chasing impact. So when they turned their attention to strategy, they did not produce a gentle, stately war simulation. They produced Z, a game that felt less like commanding an army and more like being trapped inside a military toy box while two drunk mechanics throw spanners at each other.

The game began life on the Amiga before development moved to PC as the market shifted. That detail matters. Z may be remembered as a PC strategy game, but its soul is very Amiga: fast, stylish, cheeky, and slightly allergic to doing things the obvious way. By the time it reached players, CD-ROM had changed what the team could do. Suddenly there was space for animated cutscenes, voice work, and personality. The plot was never the main point, but the presentation gave Z its flavour. Its robotic cast, including the wonderfully useless Brad and Allan, turned the campaign into a comedy of errors with guns. The story, frankly, is nonsense. But it is the good kind of nonsense. The kind where two robot soldiers crash-land, insult each other, and accidentally participate in an interplanetary war. Shakespeare it is not. But Shakespeare never wrote a scene where a robot gets annoyed because someone else is hogging the good tank. His loss. The real genius of Z is that it removes almost everything players expected from an RTS. In most strategy games of the period, the early minutes are a ritual. You build workers. You gather resources. You construct buildings. You slowly become dangerous. It is the videogame equivalent of making tea before a fight. Z throws you straight into the fight and tells you the tea can wait. Because factories are already on the map, the player’s job is not to build an economy but to seize one. That makes the opening moments of each battle incredibly important. A slow start can doom you. A bold push can win you half the map. A careless advance can hand your opponent the tank you were very proud of owning ten seconds ago.

This is where the game becomes beautifully cruel. Vehicles in Z are not locked to one side forever. If a driver dies or a vehicle is left empty, another unit can jump in. That means tanks, jeeps, and artillery are not just weapons. They are prizes. A good sniper can shoot a driver out of a vehicle, leaving it open for capture. Few things in strategy gaming are as satisfying as stealing the enemy’s hardware. Few things are as humiliating as watching your own tank roll back toward you with someone else inside. It is like having your car stolen, except the car has a cannon and is now firing at your house. Units also have personalities and roles. Grunts are basic soldiers. Psychos are more aggressive. Pyros burn things. Snipers pick off enemies from range. Toughs are big, durable bruisers. They are not merely numbers in a spreadsheet. They feel like a rowdy little gang of metal football hooligans, each with a weapon and a bad attitude. The result is a game that rewards aggression, improvisation, and map awareness. It is not about building the perfect base. It is about seeing an opportunity, grabbing it, and hoping your robots do not ruin everything by being robots.

One of the most talked-about parts of Z is its artificial intelligence. The developers spent a lot of time trying to make units behave with some independence. In theory, this made the battlefield feel alive. Robots would react to danger, jump into nearby vehicles, and make decisions without requiring constant babysitting. In practice, this sometimes made them feel like they had read the manual upside down. This is part of the game’s charm, and also part of why it can make modern players shout at the screen. A robot might do something surprisingly smart one moment, then wander into death the next with the confidence of a man following bad satnav directions into a lake. But even that fits the tone. Z is not a clean, sterile tactics game. It is messy. It is noisy. It is full of little disasters. The AI does not always feel like a perfect servant, but it often feels like another character in the comedy. That comedy was not separate from the design. It was baked into the game’s identity. Z is difficult, but it is difficult with a smirk. When you lose, the game does not feel sorry for you. It points, laughs, and starts another round.

The production of Z was long and demanding. The team put serious effort into balancing it, especially because the territory system could snowball quickly. If one player captured too much of the map too early, the match could turn into a mechanical kicking. So the developers had to make sure maps had tension. Routes, factories, flags, vehicles, and defensive positions all had to be placed in ways that encouraged conflict. A good Z map is not just a battlefield. It is a pressure cooker with flags in it. You are not calmly executing a plan. You are trying to stop your entire front line from turning into scrap while a robot with the survival instinct of a sandwich runs toward enemy fire. The CD-ROM presentation added another layer of work. The team created animated sequences, voice clips, and music that reacted to the action. Dynamic music was still a tricky thing at the time, and Z tried to make the soundtrack intensify as battles heated up. Today, players take adaptive music for granted. In the mid-1990s, doing that from a CD was more like trying to DJ during an earthquake. And yet, the effort paid off. Z had personality in a genre that could sometimes feel a little dry. The explosions helped, obviously. Explosions always help. But the humour, voices, and animation gave the game an identity that still stands out.

So was Z a success? The answer is yes, but not in the same way Command & Conquer was. Critically, Z earned respect. Reviewers praised its originality, speed, humour, and sharp break from RTS convention. It was accessible in some ways because players did not have to manage a complex economy. But it was also brutally demanding because the action started immediately and rarely let up. Commercially, however, Z never became the monster franchise it might have been. Part of that was timing. The mid-1990s RTS market was crowded, and Command & Conquer had already become a giant. Westwood’s game had huge publisher muscle behind it, memorable live-action cutscenes, and a structure that was easier for many players to understand. Z was weirder. Better dressed, perhaps. Funnier, definitely. But weirder. It asked RTS players to unlearn habits they had only recently learned. No base-building? No harvesting? No careful defensive buildup? For some players, that was thrilling. For others, it was like ordering a burger and being handed a grenade. That may explain why Z became more of a cult favourite than a mainstream titan. People who loved it really loved it. People who bounced off it probably did so after being flattened by a tank they had technically owned twelve seconds earlier. Still, cult status is not failure. Sometimes it is just success with better stories.

Z did not disappear. It received ports to other platforms, including PlayStation, Saturn, Macintosh, and later Windows versions. A sequel, Z: Steel Soldiers, arrived in 2001, moving the series into 3D. Like many early 3D transitions, it had ambition, but it did not quite capture the same lightning-in-a-bottle charm as the original. The first game eventually returned through digital re-releases, helping keep Z available to curious players who had heard whispers about “that Bitmap Brothers robot RTS where everyone shouts at you.” It is exactly the kind of game that benefits from rediscovery, because it does not feel like a forgotten clone. It feels like a strange, sharp object someone left behind in the genre’s drawer. The reason Z matters is not because it beat the giants. It did not. It matters because it offered a different answer to the same question every RTS asks: how do you make players feel like commanders? Most RTS games answered with construction, economy, and escalation. Z answered with speed, territory, and panic. It made command feel less like planning a war and more like juggling grenades while several robots argue about who gets the tank. That sounds chaotic because it is. But it is also elegant. Strip away the jokes, the cutscenes, the shouting, and the metallic swagger, and Z has a beautifully clear central idea: territory is power. Not resources. Not buildings. Not the size of your base. Land. Momentum. Position.

Modern strategy games still return to that idea. Capture points, territory control, forward pressure, map economy: these are now familiar concepts. Z was not alone in exploring them, but it expressed them with unusual purity and style. It also had something many strategy games still struggle to create: character. The robots are ridiculous, but memorable. The maps are simple, but tense. The matches are short, sharp, and frequently unfair in the way only old games can be unfair: with complete confidence. Playing Z today can be frustrating. The controls are old. The AI can be strange. The difficulty can bite. But it still feels alive. It still has speed. It still has jokes. It still has that unmistakable Bitmap Brothers attitude, all metal surfaces and raised eyebrows. Many RTS games from the 1990s wanted you to feel like a grand commander. Z wanted you to feel like someone had handed you a walkie-talkie, three idiots, and a tank with no brakes. And honestly, that is still a pretty good pitch.

Spread the love

MORE AMIGA & RETRO NEWS